JEFF CHILDERS - Coffee & Covid 04-14-2023 on The Classified Documents Leak

? Yesterday evening, the Wall Street Journal ran an utterly fabulous monstrosity of a story headlined, “Air Guardsman Arrested in Connection With Leaked Documents.”

In a story so moronic that it is painful to have to write about it (they’re practically daring me to use the ‘r’ word, and I’ll do it, just try me), the 100% government-controlled, perfectly useless, heinously criminal corporate media was made out to be the hero of the evolving narrative. As I type this, I can feel the IQ points storming out of my cranium in a huff, bags hastily packed, irate at just being asked to consider this ridiculous fairy tale sufficiently credible to even make fun of it. It’s the kind of story I would usually blithely ignore, except that a hastily-assembled taradiddle like this one evidences a historic, narrative-wrecking goof up of Bidenic proportions.

FDA acts to expand use of treatment for COVID-19 patients with mild-to-moderate disease Veklury is not a substitute for vaccination against COVID-19 in eligible individuals

 New Emails Reveal Fauci’s Role in Shaping Highly Influential Paper That Established COVID ‘Natural Origin’ Narrative

By Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke January 20, 2022 Updated: January 20, 2022  Print  News Analysis  EPOCH TIMES


‘Debunking The 1619 Project’ Reveals The Difference Between History And Propaganda

Historian Mary Grabar's book, 'Debunking The 1619 Project,' provides lots of useful historical context and facts to counter The New York Times' racial sophistry.
Auguste Meyrat By 

When discussing The 1619 Project—a series of essays that argue the history of America’s founding was a racist endeavor to preserve and perpetuate slavery—it’s important to realize that it is fundamentally a work of journalism, not actual history. Doing what they do best, some writers for The New York Times put together a leftist narrative based on partial truths, dubious scholarship, and outright fabrications that they packaged as something new and significant.

As such, it is mostly immune to criticism or correction. Like most fake news, the accounts were read, accepted, and processed before those with actual knowledge could respond with the truth. Numerous historians eventually came out against the 1619 Project, even one who was consulted for the project itself, and all were either ignored or at best placated with cosmetic changes to some of the project’s advertisements. CONTINUE READING >>>

Yuri Bezmenov’s Marxist Crisis Is Near
by  (American Spectator)  November 9, 2021
Demoralization. Destabilization. Crisis. Normalization.

Long-time readers of this column will remember those four words from an entry in this space exactly 17 months ago. That entry, a column entitled “Four Stages of Marxist Takeover: The Accuracy of Yuri Bezmenov,” was the most heavily trafficked item of mine last year, and either the busiest or one of the busiest on The American Spectator‘s entire site in 2020.

That happened for a reason. Namely, that it described exactly what was happening in America, and why there was a method to the apparent madness. CONTINUE READING >>>