image_2021-12-05_145815.png

‘Debunking The 1619 Project’ Reveals The Difference Between History And Propaganda

Historian Mary Grabar's book, 'Debunking The 1619 Project,' provides lots of useful historical context and facts to counter The New York Times' racial sophistry.
 
Auguste Meyrat By 
 

When discussing The 1619 Project—a series of essays that argue the history of America’s founding was a racist endeavor to preserve and perpetuate slavery—it’s important to realize that it is fundamentally a work of journalism, not actual history. Doing what they do best, some writers for The New York Times put together a leftist narrative based on partial truths, dubious scholarship, and outright fabrications that they packaged as something new and significant.

As such, it is mostly immune to criticism or correction. Like most fake news, the accounts were read, accepted, and processed before those with actual knowledge could respond with the truth. Numerous historians eventually came out against the 1619 Project, even one who was consulted for the project itself, and all were either ignored or at best placated with cosmetic changes to some of the project’s advertisements. CONTINUE READING >>>